{"id":5902,"date":"2026-05-31T20:08:30","date_gmt":"2026-05-31T18:08:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ak-law.pl\/blog\/does-the-sale-of-shares-result-in-immediate-loss-of-sme-status\/"},"modified":"2026-09-23T15:47:00","modified_gmt":"2026-09-23T13:47:00","slug":"does-the-sale-of-shares-result-in-immediate-loss-of-sme-status","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ak-law.pl\/en\/blog\/does-the-sale-of-shares-result-in-immediate-loss-of-sme-status\/","title":{"rendered":"Does the sale of shares result in immediate loss of SME status?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Loss of SME status may have significant consequences for a business receiving State aid, but a sale of shares does not in itself determine either the company\u2019s subsequent status or whether funding must be repaid. Where there is a change of ownership, the SME status, the conditions of the relevant programme and funding agreement, and the impact of the transaction on <a href=\"https:\/\/ak-law.pl\/en\/blog\/project-sustainability-can-a-project-still-be-subject-to-control-after-completion\/\" data-type=\"post\" data-id=\"3542\">project sustainability<\/a> must be assessed separately. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Particular questions arise where ownership changes take place after funding has been awarded. Does the entry of a new investor or the sale of shares automatically result in loss of SME status? And can it lead to an obligation to repay funding? The implications of a company sale are discussed in more detail here: <a href=\"https:\/\/ak-law.pl\/en\/blog\/does-the-sale-of-a-company-require-repayment-of-funding\/\">Must funding be repaid after the sale of a company?<\/a>   <\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-medium-font-size\">What determines SME status?<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The definition of a micro, small or medium-sized enterprise is set out in <a href=\"https:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/legal-content\/PL\/TXT\/PDF\/?uri=CELEX:02014R0651-20230701\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Annex I to Commission Regulation No 651\/2014<\/a> (GBER). In determining SME status, account is taken of the number of employees and the financial data of the enterprise. It is also relevant whether the enterprise is autonomous, a partner enterprise or a linked enterprise. In the case of partner and linked enterprises, the data of other enterprises are taken into account in the appropriate proportion.   <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A change of ownership may therefore alter the group of enterprises whose data must be taken into account when determining SME status. At the same time, Article 4(2) of Annex I to the GBER provides that exceeding or falling below the relevant headcount or financial thresholds results in the loss or acquisition of SME status only where that situation occurs over two consecutive accounting periods.   <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This rule is particularly important in the context of ownership changes, but it should not be understood as a simple \u201ctwo-year grace period\u201d running from the date on which the shares were sold. The relevant accounting periods, the structure of the group of enterprises and the data that must be taken into account in the particular case need to be determined. <\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-medium-font-size\">Does an acquisition by a large investor result in loss of SME status on the transaction date?<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For many years, the view was expressed in practice that the acquisition of an enterprise by a large entity results in an immediate change of status. This approach was presented, among other sources, in the European Commission\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/op.europa.eu\/en\/publication-detail\/-\/publication\/756d9260-ee54-11ea-991b-01aa75ed71a1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">User Guide to the SME Definition<\/a>. The difficulty is that the User Guide is a guidance document rather than a source of binding law.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Of particular importance in this respect is the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 9 September 2020 in Kerkosand, T-745\/17. The Court indicated that, when assessing SME status, the relevant accounting periods must first be identified, the relevant partner and linked enterprises must be determined, and it must then be established whether the SME thresholds were exceeded over two consecutive accounting periods. The date on which the shares were sold is therefore not sufficient in itself to determine the enterprise\u2019s status. The structure of the group and the data relevant to the accounting periods resulting from Annex I to the GBER must be reconstructed.    <\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-medium-font-size\">The sale of shares and loss of SME status are one issue. Project sustainability is another. <\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This distinction is particularly important for funding recipients. A sale of shares may create new links between enterprises and affect the data taken into account when determining the company\u2019s status. At the same time, a share transaction does not, as a rule, transfer the company\u2019s assets. The funding recipient remains the same company. Its equipment, infrastructure, project results and rights arising from agreements remain part of its assets unless the transaction is accompanied by additional measures.    <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For a funded project, the following issues should therefore be examined separately:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>the impact of the transaction on SME status,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>any information obligations or requirement to obtain approval arising from the funding agreement,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>the impact of the transaction on the manner in which the project is implemented,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>ownership of the project infrastructure and other project assets,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>continuation of the business activity,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>maintenance of project results and indicators,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>the sustainability requirements applicable to the particular project.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Analysing these elements, among others, makes it possible to assess the actual risk. <\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-medium-font-size\"><strong>What did the Supreme Administrative Court say in such a case?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It is worth referring here to a case concerning a funding recipient whose shares were sold to a large enterprise during the project sustainability period. The funding institution linked the change in ownership to the loss of SME status and a breach of project sustainability requirements, and subsequently determined that part of the funding had to be repaid. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">In its judgment of 11 March 2026, the Supreme Administrative Court set aside both the earlier judgment of the Voivodeship Administrative Court and the decision determining the amount to be repaid. The available summary of the ruling indicates that a change in the funding recipient\u2019s ownership structure does not in itself constitute a breach of the sustainability of the operation where there has been no change in the nature or objective of the project.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This ruling is important because it distinguishes the sale of shares from actual changes affecting the project. The entry of a new shareholder into a company that continues its business activities and retains the project infrastructure should be assessed differently from a transaction involving the transfer of assets, a change in the business activity or discontinuation of the project. <\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-medium-font-size\"><strong>Why did the funding institution consider the recipient to have lost its SME status?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The funding institution took the view that the acquisition of the company by a large enterprise automatically changed the recipient\u2019s status from an SME to a large enterprise. Under this interpretation, SME status was lost on the transaction date itself. Since the project was intended for the SME sector, continued use of the funding by an enterprise controlled by a large entity was considered to breach the programme rules and confer an undue advantage.  <\/p>\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image aligncenter size-full\"><img fetchpriority=\"high\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"684\" height=\"138\" src=\"https:\/\/ak-law.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Stanowisko-Instytucji.png\" alt=\"Sale of shares and loss of SME status\" class=\"wp-image-4287\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ak-law.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Stanowisko-Instytucji.png 684w, https:\/\/ak-law.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Stanowisko-Instytucji-300x61.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 684px) 100vw, 684px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This position was based, among other things, on the interpretation presented in the European Commission\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/op.europa.eu\/en\/publication-detail\/-\/publication\/756d9260-ee54-11ea-991b-01aa75ed71a1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">User Guide to the SME Definition<\/a>, according to which an acquisition may result in immediate loss of SME status as of the transaction date.<\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-medium-font-size\"><strong>What did the funding recipient argue?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The funding recipient argued that, under Article 4(2) of Annex I to the GBER, SME status is acquired or lost only where the relevant thresholds are exceeded, or the enterprise falls below them, over two consecutive accounting periods.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The company also argued that a change of ownership does not in itself constitute a breach of project sustainability requirements. The project continued to be implemented in accordance with the funding agreement, the infrastructure was not disposed of, the business activity continued and the project objectives remained unchanged. <\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-medium-font-size\"><strong>What did the court decide?<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The court rejected the funding institution\u2019s position. It held that the GBER provides for the rule of two consecutive accounting periods and that neither Annex I to the Regulation nor any other applicable provisions establish a specific exception to that rule where an enterprise is acquired by another entity.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Supreme Administrative Court also referred to the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 9 September 2020 in Kerkosand (T-745\/17). The General Court questioned whether the rule requiring two consecutive accounting periods could be disapplied on the basis of the position presented by the European Commission in its SME User Guide.  <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The following passages from the court\u2019s reasoning are particularly relevant:<\/p>\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image aligncenter size-full\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"684\" height=\"215\" src=\"https:\/\/ak-law.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Stanowisko-sadu-2.png\" alt=\"Excerpt from the court&#x2019;s reasoning on the two-accounting-period rule\" class=\"wp-image-4288\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ak-law.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Stanowisko-sadu-2.png 684w, https:\/\/ak-law.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Stanowisko-sadu-2-300x94.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 684px) 100vw, 684px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Supreme Administrative Court held that the mere sale of shares to a large enterprise does not in itself determine either the loss of SME status or a breach of project sustainability requirements.<\/p>\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image aligncenter size-full is-resized\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"684\" height=\"197\" src=\"https:\/\/ak-law.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Stanowisko-sadu-1.png\" alt=\"Excerpt from the court&#x2019;s reasoning on the effect of a share sale on SME status\" class=\"wp-image-4289\" style=\"width:684px;height:auto\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ak-law.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Stanowisko-sadu-1.png 684w, https:\/\/ak-law.pl\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Stanowisko-sadu-1-300x86.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 684px) 100vw, 684px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-medium-font-size\">Does loss of SME status automatically mean repayment of funding?<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A change in the enterprise\u2019s classification does not in itself mean that a breach has occurred which gives rise to an obligation to repay the entire amount of funding.<\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">It is necessary to determine, among other things:<\/p>\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li>whether and at what stage SME status was a condition for receiving the funding,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>whether SME status had to be maintained and, if so, for what period,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>what obligation arose from the funding agreement or programme documentation,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>whether the ownership change affected the project,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>whether the funding institution links a specific breach to the transaction,<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>how that breach relates to the amount whose repayment is being demanded.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">For this reason, loss of SME status, an ownership change and repayment of funding should be examined as related but distinct issues.<\/p>\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-medium-font-size\">A sale of shares in a company receiving funding requires a project review before the transaction<\/h2>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">A transaction which, from a company-law perspective, primarily involves a change of shareholder may have additional consequences for a project financed with public funds. What matters is therefore not only the transaction documents, but also the history of the company\u2019s SME status, the funding agreement, the applicable sustainability requirements and the way in which the company actually operates after the ownership change. <\/p>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The Supreme Administrative Court\u2019s judgment of 11 March 2026 shows that a sale of shares should not automatically be equated with a breach of project sustainability requirements. At the same time, every transaction of this kind requires an assessment of its specific consequences for the funding recipient and the conditions on which the funding was granted.  <\/p>\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><em>Are you planning a sale of shares, the entry of a new investor, or another ownership change in a company receiving public funding? More information on legal support concerning SME status and ownership changes is available here: <a href=\"https:\/\/ak-law.pl\/en\/scope-of-services\/project-controls-and-repayment-of-funding\/\">Project controls, financial corrections and repayment of funding<\/a>. <\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Does a sale of shares result in loss of SME status on the transaction date? This is a key question in investments, acquisitions and publicly funded projects. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":5901,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[91,92],"tags":[102,100,101,93,103],"class_list":["post-5902","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-financial-corrections-and-repayment-of-funding","category-state-aid","tag-avoiding-repayment-of-funding","tag-eu-funds-2","tag-funding","tag-repayment-of-funding","tag-sme-status"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ak-law.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5902","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ak-law.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ak-law.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ak-law.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ak-law.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5902"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/ak-law.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5902\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6649,"href":"https:\/\/ak-law.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5902\/revisions\/6649"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ak-law.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/5901"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ak-law.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5902"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ak-law.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5902"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ak-law.pl\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5902"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}